Friday, December 9, 2011

The Crown Office - Unfit To Prosecute me, Unfit For Purpose?

The Scottish Law Reporter publishes another disturbing story about the ongoing transparent bias displayed against me by the Crown Office, this time hinting at something even deeper- a possible conspiracy.

The reporter in question in the article is from the Scottish Sun.

Many similar instances of malpractice in this case have occurred, beginning with my exposing Elish Angiolini`s established misconduct in 2009 and 2010 as highlighted in previous blogs.

On 4th December 2009, Procurator Fiscal Stephen McGowan made a false statement about the involvement of Elish Angiolini in the Hollie Greig case. He has since made a false statement to an official investigation in regards to his statement in open court on 18th August 2011. Despite being asked to remove himself as chief prosecutor by my defence lawyers, he still refuses to go. He has also been served a citation to appear as a key witness for the defence. A further hearing at Stonehaven about this sole issue will take place on 21st December.

On the 12th and 13th February 2010, I was arrested and charged in Aberdeen and had my home in Cheshire raided, in which my entire defence was stolen and has not yet been returned to me. Of course, my computer was among the many items taken. Curiously, the father and brother of Hollie never even had their computers checked, which is standard police procedure when individuals are accused of serious sexual offences.

It tok sixteen months of evasions before Grampian Police provided a copy of the search warrant, to find that it had been signed by Sheriff Patrick Davies, a close associate of one of the accused.

My arrest was authorised by Elish Angiolini, the personi had earlier publicly exposed for malpractice whilst holding the office of Lord Advocate.

Sheriff Davies went on to officiate at four subsequent hearings, including one closed session on 30th April 2010, denying me the opportunity to campaign as candidate for te Aberdeen South constituency by making a provably inaccurate statement in one of his reasons for doing so.

On 13th April 2011, in open court, Procurator Fiscal Anne Currie misled Sheriff Valerie Johnston regarding  witnesses she falsely and deliberately stated were suffering from trauma, in an attempt to procure a miscarriage of justice against me. She is currently subject to an official investigation as a result and has continued to lie to the investigator about the content of her statement.

Around this time, the Scottish Legal Aid Board were persistently attempting to deny me Legal Aid. A member of the Board is Douglas Haggarty QC, a convicted sex offender, who had been apprehended in a public toilet in Glasgow with a 17-year-old male prostitute. Such is the calibre of those in whose hands my freedom depends.

On the afternoon of 14th November 2011, six hours after the trial had begun, I was told that the prosecution had suddenly produced sixty-one witness statements, none of which had been disclosed to me and I have still yet to see.

Now we have the highly suspicious incident that took place on 15th November 2011, after my Senior Counsel had unexpectedly and inexplicibly suggested that I change my plea to guilty, just hours after being led to believe that the Crown`s position was hopeless.

Given its obligations to objectivity, balance and  impartiality, do you think the Crown Office is fit to prosecute me?


  1. I think NO, it's NOT.
    Good God,
    your Senior Councel has sided with the prosecution and the only choice I can see is to sack them all and represent yourself as well as you can.
    Dear God ...

  2. If there was a god this would not have happened in the first place.

    Keep going Robert, keep going.

    As Fletcher said in porridge " dont let the bastards grind you down "

    Robert. Have a great Xmas and a victorious new year.

    Love and wishes Martin

  3. You're an inspiration Robert!

    Keep going, the love is with you

    You're a massive part of the change

    Love & Positive Energy

  4. there is obviously something very dodgy indeed going on- and all these little officious minions running round trying to wallpaper over cracks in their story wider than the grand canyon!
    its a total farce and doesnt even appear to be legal and above board!
    in a way its rather funny watching them try to hide an elephant under a tablecloth- a half million pound breach of the peace case? unreal.
    breach of the peace isnt even a proper crime is it?
    its like a "drunk and disorderly" ora "drunk in a public highway charge"- there not REAL crimes just things the police can do if you backchat them basically which is what you did Mr green isnt- you disrespected the authority of people with letters after there names and big houses... cant have that Mr can we?
    why do we even pretend that the "justice" system in this country is any such thing?

  5. I have the utmost respect for you Robert, especially now that I'm experiencing the farce they call justice in my own case. The judiciary have no scruples or morals or even a modicum of conscience, otherwise Hollie would have had justice a long time ago. All anyone can do, is to keep going until every single citizen in the uk know what's going on, and we storm the "Bastille". The sad thing is, that we have the power to bring them down,and "they" know it, but there is too much apathy from the masses. That has to change for change to happen. It can't always be down to the few, people need to realise we all have a responsibility for each other.

    I've said before Robert, I have no idea how you cope with all this, but you are one very special human being indeed. Sadly, regardless of the outcome, this will go down in history, as a shame on all of us, but you and a few others, can hold your heads high.

    I hope and pray, that someone with integrity and a conscience, comes forward to take the case on and goes on to give us back a sense of justice.

    Sarah x

  6. We must stop thinking that people "in power" in any way are more intelligent-has a better moral standing -in some ways are the slightest superior to COMMON MAN.

  7. Hi Robert,

    It is clear to all what is going on here, mate.

    At first these peadophiles tried to intimidate you.

    When it became clear that wouldn't work they probably gave your corrupt senior counsel a special masonic handshake & reminded him who he really worked for.

    And since that didn't work either, they are now blatantly trying to corrupt the very process they use against others.

    Your courage & integrity shames our 'legal' system & exposes the depravity of most of those involved in it.

    Our judicial system is morally bankrupt... & your simple refusal to be silenced or acquiesce is revealing their utter cowardice & guilt. It is also a lesson for us all.

    If a critical mass refuse to shut up & sit down & cooperate with the system that is raping our children & protecting the pedophiles responsible then we can change this.

    I refuse to pay taxes & licences any longer to these child rapists.

    "More is a man of an angel's wit & singular learning; I know not his fellow. For where is the man of that gentleness, lowliness & affability? And as time requireth a man of marvellous mirth & pastimes; & sometimes of sad gravity: a man for all seasons."

    Robert Whittinton (1520)

    Robert, you are a man for all seasons.

    If I can help you in anyway, please let me know.

    Love & Respect.

  8. Robert - just keep in your heart the mantra that has been used so often lately:

    The Whole World is Watching
    The Whole World is Watching

    Much love to you and yours

  9. Welcome to 1984
    The whole world IS watching and cheering you on.
    As a very ex scot this case explains why we left !

    Keep up the great work, love and prayers for all of you in this case.

  10. Thought connects.

    I use a simple technique to return bad energy back to source, using The law of Karma, and a mirror in the mind.

    I used it in my own trials ( 3 lawyers had unexpected career terminations - google judge chubb ), and it has proved successful in more recent cases ( Ian Puddick free speech case, June 2011, and the ongoing Michael Doherty police corruption case ).

    It is SO simple!

    People who do nasty things, stack up karmic debts.

    So all that is required, is to place yourself, and the person(s) giving you grief, before The Law of Karma.

    Beyond that, you have no input whatsoever.

    If a fraction of what you allege is true, Robert, these people have huge debts to pay!

    I simply let them know how I see The Law of Karma working, in document form.

    Good luck! Zen